In Itxa/1007/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Central -Iii v. M/S. Virtuous Finance Ltd, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: DATE :- 10[th] March, 2014 PC: 1Since Mr.Vimal Gupta has been designated as Senior Advocate by this Court, but the Department has failed to make any arrangement so as to represent itself in these appeals, the Appeals are dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
kps
*1*itxa.1006.1007.1037.12.30.31.43.con
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1006 OF 2012WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1007 OF 2012WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1037 OF 2012
The Commissioner of Income Tax Central-III.
..Appellant
-Versus-M/s Virtuous Finance Ltd..
..Respondent
...........
None for the Appellant/ Revenue.Mr.Percy Pardiwala a/w Mr.P.C.Tripathi i/by A.K.Jasani, for the Respondent.
...........
CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARIAND GIRISH S. KULKARNI, JJ.
DATE :- 10[th] March, 2014
PC:
1Since Mr.Vimal Gupta has been designated as Senior Advocate by this Court, but the Department has failed to make any arrangement so as to represent itself in these appeals, the Appeals are dismissed for want of prosecution. No costs.
(GIRISH S. KULKARNI, J.)
(S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue