Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/1009/2013 Of The Commissioner Of In...

Itxa/1009/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central) v. Moti Udharam Panjabi

High Court 15 Mar 2013 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/1009/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central) v. Moti Udharam Panjabi
Date of order
15 Mar 2013
Assessment year(s)
2002-03
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/1009/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central) v. Moti Udharam Panjabi, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to (M.S.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

sas IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.416 OF 2013 The Commissioner of Income Tax (Central), Mumbai ..Appellant. V/s. Moti Udharam Panjabi ..Respondent. Mr. Tejveer Singh for the appellant. Mr. Mihir Naniwadekar for the respondent. CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND M.S. SANKLECHA, JJ. DATED : 15TH MARCH, 2013 P.C. :- 1.In this appeal by the revenue for the assessment year 2002-03, following question of law is raised for our consideration;- “ Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal is justified in not giving its finding on the facts brought out in paras 4 to 10 of its order dated 31/10/2012 which clearly indicates that the capital gains shown by the assessee on sale of penny stocks is not genuine ?” itxal-416-13 2.On perusing the impugned order it is noted that the Tribunal has restored the issue to the assessing officer for fresh decision after considering the evidence placed before him. Hence we see no reason to entertain the proposed question of law. 3.costs. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to (M.S. SANKLECHA, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan