Case Law › High Court › Itxa/1010/2011 Of Sadhana Nabera v. Asst...

Itxa/1010/2011 Of Sadhana Nabera v. Asstt. Commissioner Ofincome Tax Range -25 (3)

High Court 13 Oct 2021 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

13 Oct 2021

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/1010/2011 Of Sadhana Nabera v. Asstt. Commissioner Ofincome Tax Range -25 (3), the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Digitallysigned byMEERAMEERAMAHESHMAHESHJADHAVJADHAVDate:2021.10.1415:35:59+0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1010 OF 2011 Sadhana Nabera V/s.Asstt. Commissioner of Income TaxRange 25(3), Mumbai ….Appellant ….Respondent ---- Ms Dinkle Haria i/b Mr. Sameer G. Dalal for Appellant ---- CORAM : K.R. SHRIRAM &AMIT B. BORKAR, JJ DATED : 13[th] OCTOBER 2021 P.C. : 1Ms Haria seeks leave to withdraw the appeal. Appeal dismissed as withdrawn. 2Refund of court fees, if any, in accordance with rules. (AMIT B. BORKAR, J) (K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.