Itxa/101/2008 Of Commissioner Of Income-Tax-19, Mumbai-12 v. Smt Pamela Mohile
High Court
27 Jun 2008 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/101/2008 Of Commissioner Of Income-Tax-19, Mumbai-12 v. Smt Pamela Mohile
Date of order
27 Jun 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Itxa/101/2008 Of Commissioner Of Income-Tax-19, Mumbai-12 v. Smt Pamela Mohile, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Appeal is dismissed aswithdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.101 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax-19Mumbai V/s.Smt.Pamela Mohite
..Appellant
..Respondent
Mr.Ravindra G. Bhat, Advocate, for appellant Mr.Atul K. Jasani, Advocate, for respondent
CORAM : F.I.REBELLO &
K.U.CHANDIWAL, JJ.
DATE : 27TH JUNE, 2008
P.C..The learned counsel for the assessee points out thatMiscellaneous Application No.382/Mum/2007 was taken up beforeITAT which has been allowed and in the light of that nothing survivesin this appeal. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of appellantseeks leave to withdraw the appeal. Appeal is dismissed aswithdrawn. Refund of Court fees, if any, as per rules.
(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(K.U.CHANDIWAL, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue