Itxa/1017/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -4, Mumbai v. M/S Daga Fibres Private Limited
High Court
26 Jul 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/1017/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -4, Mumbai v. M/S Daga Fibres Private Limited
Date of order
26 Jul 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/1017/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -4, Mumbai v. M/S Daga Fibres Private Limited, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 3.Accordingly, all the four appeals are dismissed for non-prosecution.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1017 OF 2008WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1020 OF 2008WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1022 OF 2008 WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1023 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax-4
.. Appellant
v/s.
M/s. Daga Fibres Pvt. Ltd.
..Respondent
None for the appellant None for the respondent
CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.J.
P.C.
DATED : 26[th] JULY, 2018.
1.When these appeals were called out earlier, none appeared in
support of these appeals. Therefore, the appeals were kept back. Onbeing called the second time also, none appeared in support of theseappeals.
2.It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the
present appeals. This is more particularly so as the parties and
advocates were put to notice on 13[th] July, 2018 that these appealswould be taken up for consideration today.
3.Accordingly, all the four appeals are dismissed for non-prosecution.
(SANDEEP K. SHINDE J.)
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue