In Itxa/1020/2007 Of Thecommissioner Ofincome-Tax,9,Mum v. M/S. Shabayesha Construction Co. Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Revenue is in appeal on the following question. assessee, the learned counsel does not claim right to the said shares. light of that, there is no merits in the appeal which is accordingly dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1020 OF 2007The Commissioner of Income Tax-9...Appellant.Vs.M/s. Shabayesha Construction Co.Pvt. Ltd...Respondent.Mr.P.S. Sahadevan for the Appellant.
Mr.R. Murlidhar with Mr. Darshan Mehta i/by DhruveLiladhar & Co. for the Respondent.
CORAM : F.I. REBELLO &R.S. MOHITE, JJ.DATE : 23rd March, 2009
PC :
1. Revenue is in appeal on the following question.
assessee, the learned counsel does not claim right to
the said shares.
light of that, there is no merits in the appeal which is
accordingly dismissed.
(R.S. MOHITE, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue