Itxa/1023/2004 Of Mukund U.agawal v. Joint Commissioner Of Income-Taxspl.rg. 33
High Court
06 Jul 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/1023/2004 Of Mukund U.agawal v. Joint Commissioner Of Income-Taxspl.rg. 33
Date of order
06 Jul 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/1023/2004 Of Mukund U.agawal v. Joint Commissioner Of Income-Taxspl.rg. 33, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: In the above view, the Appeal is dismissed fornon-prosecution.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
Rane
* 1/1 *
SR.916 (ITXA-1023-2004)
Friday, 6.7.2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1023 OF 2004
Mukund U. Agarwal….AppellantV/s.Joint Commissioner ofIncome-Tax, SpecialRange-33, Mumbai….Respondent
* * * * *
Mr. Atul Jasani, Advocate for the appellant.
Mr. P.C. Chhotaray, Advocate for the respondent.
CORAM :- M.S. SANKLECHA, &
DATE :-
SANDEEP K. SHINDE, JJ.6TH JULY, 2018.
P.C. :-
1.
Mr. Jasani, Learned Counsel appearing in
support of the Appeal states that inspite of the bestefforts, no instructions were forthcoming from theappellant. In the above view, the Appeal is dismissed fornon-prosecution.
(SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J)
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue