Itxa/1025/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-7,Mum v. M/S Rajan Tube Products Pvt Dltd
High Court
10 Jul 2008 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/1025/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-7,Mum v. M/S Rajan Tube Products Pvt Dltd
Date of order
10 Jul 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Itxa/1025/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-7,Mum v. M/S Rajan Tube Products Pvt Dltd, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: 2.Mr.Kango, the learned Counsel for the Appellant, seeks leave to withdraw the above Appeal.The Appeal is allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed assuch.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1025 OF 2007
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1025 OF 2007
The Commissioner of Income-Tax,.CIT-7, Mumbai...AppellantV/s.Rajan Tube Product Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai...Respondent
Mr.A.D. Kango, Advocate, for the Appellant.None for the Respondent.
P.C. :
CORAM : DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN &A.V. NIRGUDE, JJ.DATE : 10TH JULY, 2008.
.Heard the learned Counsel for the Appellant.
2.Mr.Kango, the learned Counsel for the
Appellant, seeks leave to withdraw the above Appeal.The Appeal is allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed assuch.
3.Permissible Court fees shall be refunded tothe Appellant as per rules.
[A.V. NIRGUDE, J.] [DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.