In Itxa/103/2009 Of The Conmmissiosner Oincome-Taxiii v. Smt.rani W. Bijlani, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
ASN
cannot be said to be a case decided or judgment of this
court.
3. We find no reason as to why the Government shouldsuffer for the acts of the officer who had filed the
appeal without following the CBDT circular which was
binding on him.
4. Considering that the sum of Rs.9430/- which was paidas court fees be recovered from the salary of theofficer Shri. K.K.Sharma, who has preferred this appeal
and compliance of this order be filed in this court
within one month from today.
(R.S. MOHITE, J.)
(F.I. REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.