Itxa/1033/2015 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-17 v. Jaikishan S.vaswani

Priya Soparkar1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.111 OF 2013 The Commissioner of Income Tax-12, Mumbai.… Appellant V/s. Shri Vinod Shivprasad Vaid … Respondent WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1188 OF 2013 Commissioner of Income Tax-12… Appellant V/s. M/s Sukani Enterprises … Respondent WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1901 OF 2013 Commissioner of Income Tax-13 V/s. Vivek Arya (HUF) … Appellant … Respondent WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.63 OF 2014 Commissioner of Income Tax-12 V/s.Shri Tikuchand D. Jogani … Appellant … Respondent WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1033 OF 2015 The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-17… Appellant V/s.Shri Jaikishan S. Vaswani … Respondent … Respondent Priya Soparkar WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.12 OF 2018 The Commissioner of Income-tax(TDS)-1 … Appellant V/s. Laqshya Media Pvt. Ltd. … Respondent --- Mr.P.C.Chhotaray for the Appellants. Mr.Atul Jasani for the Respondent in ITXA Nos.111 of 2013,1986 of 2013 and 1901 of 2013. Mr.Upendra Lokegaonkar i/by M/s MINT & CONFRERES for theRespondent in ITXA No.1188 of 2013. Mr.Ashok Patil for the Respondent in ITXA No.63 of 2014. Mr.Jitendra Singh for the Respondent in ITXA No.1033 of 2015. --- CORAM : AKIL KURESHI AND M.S.SANKLECHA, JJ. DATE : MARCH 04, 2019. P.C.:- 1.These Appeals under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) challenge the orders passed by the Income Tax AppellateTribunal (the Tribunal). 2.Mr.P.C.Chhotaray, learned Counsel appearing for the Revenue states that he has been instructed not to press these appeals. This forthe reason that the tax effect in each of these appeals is less thanRs.50 lakhs as provided in CBDT Circular No.3 of 2018 dated 11[th]July, 2018. 3.Accordingly, all these Appeals are dismissed as not pressed. 4.Refund of Court Fees, as per Rules. (M.S.SANKLECHA,J.) (AKIL KURESHI,J.) ….