Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/1037/2004 Of M/S Maruti Corporation...

Itxa/1037/2004 Of M/S Maruti Corporation v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax-Circle-71

High Court 14 Feb 2005 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/1037/2004 Of M/S Maruti Corporation v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax-Circle-71
Date of order
14 Feb 2005
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Itxa/1037/2004 Of M/S Maruti Corporation v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax-Circle-71, the High Court (2005) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Appeal is allowed to be withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARYORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1037 OF 2004 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1037 OF 2004 M/s.Maruti Corporation ..Appellant. V/s. Dy.Commissioner of Income-tax ..Respondent. Mr.A.K. Jasani for the appellant. CORAM : S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 14TH FEBRUARY, 2005. P.C. :- P.C. :- 1. Not on Board. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant. Learned counsel for the appellant states that in view of the order passed in M.A. No.363/Mun/2004 by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 13th January, 2005, the appellant seeks leave to withdraw this appeal. A copy of the aforesaid order dated 13th January, 2005 is taken on record. Appeal is allowed to be withdrawn. 3. Court fees, as permissible under the rules, be refunded to the appellant. (S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan