Itxa/1043/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -Iii v. Seco Tools India Pvt. Ltd
High Court
26 Sep 2014 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/1043/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -Iii v. Seco Tools India Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
26 Sep 2014
Assessment year(s)
2004-2005
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Itxa/1043/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -Iii v. Seco Tools India Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2014) decided the matter.
Decision: 3The Appeal is, accordingly, disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
kps
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1043 OF 2012
The Commissioner of Income Tax.-Versus-Seco Tools India Pvt.Ltd..
..Appellant
..Respondent
...........
Mr.Tejveer Singh, for the Appellant.Mr.Atul K. Jasani, for the Respondent.
...........
CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARI
AND A.K. MENON, JJ.
DATE :- 26[th] September, 2014
P.C.:
1After having heard Mr.Jasani, learned counsel appearing for the Assessee, and who fairly points out an order dated 05.09.2012 passed by the Tribunal on Miscellaneous Application No.153/PN/2011, nothing survives in this Appeal. The effect of the subsequent order on the Miscellaneous Application is that the Tribunal has recalled the original order passed by it in Income Tax Appeal No.161/PN/2010 dated 08.06.29011. That is in relation to Assessment Year 2004-2005.
2Once the Tribunal has recalled the original order and in it's entirety, the net result is that the Appeal revives to the file of the Tribunal. The original order is wiped out and the Revenue cannot challenge or impugn the order as the same does not exist at all. In these circumstances we need not pursue this Appeal and it is, accordingly, disposed of. A copy of the order passed on the Miscellaneous Application as tendered by
Mr.Jasani is taken on record and is marked “X” for identification.
3The Appeal is, accordingly, disposed of. No costs.
(A.K. MENON, J.)
(S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.