In Itxa/1043/2018 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-8, Mumbai v. Rediff. Com India Ltd, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYDigitallysigned byPURTIORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONPURTIPRASADPRASADPARABPARABDate:2024.02.0813:48:19+0530 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1043 OF 2018
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax – 8Mumbai
V/s.Rediff. Com India Ltd.
….Appellant
…Respondent
----
Mr. Devvrat Singh for Appellant.Mr. B. D. Damodar i/b Kanga & Co for Respondent.
----
CORAM : K.R. SHRIRAM & DR. NEELA GOKHALE, JJ. DATED : 7[th] FEBRUARY 2024
DR. NEELA GOKHALE, JJ.
P.C. :
1.Mr. Singh for appellant in fairness states that the issues involvedin this appeal is squarely covered by the order passed by this court on 29[th]September 2021 in Income Tax Appeal No. 647 of 2017. Therefore, thisappeal also be disposed.
2.Appeal disposed.
(DR. NEELA GOKHALE, J.)
(K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue