Itxa/1057/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -Ii Pune v. Rahul Construction Company
High Court
16 Sep 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/1057/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -Ii Pune v. Rahul Construction Company
Date of order
16 Sep 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Itxa/1057/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -Ii Pune v. Rahul Construction Company, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.
Decision: In the above view, all the appeals are disposed of aswithdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 538 OF 2013
The Commissioner of Income Tax v/s.
M/s. P.V. Mahadkar & Associates
.. Appellant
.. Respondent
ALONG WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NOS. 607 OF 2013, 608 OF 2013,1057 OF 2013, 1386 OF 2014, 1820 OF 2014, 1605 OF 2017,1656 OF 2017, 1662 OF 2017, 1749 OF 2017, 2006 OF 2017,232 OF 2018, 564 OF 2018, 726 OF 2018, 760 OF 2018,1428 OF 2018, 1434 OF 2018, 1494 OF 2018, 1509 OF 2018,1515 OF 2018, 1531 OF 2018, 1591 OF 2018, 2090 OF 2018,2637 OF 2018, 3101 OF 2018, 3240 OF 2018, 3304 OF 2018,65 OF 2019, 1022 OF 2019 AND 1330 OF 2019
Mr. Arvind Pinto for the appellant in ITXA Nos. 538/13, 607/13,608/13, and 1057/13
Mr. Sham Walve for the appellant in ITXA Nos. 1820/14, 1605/17,1656/17, 1662/17, 1749/17, 2006/17, 232/18, 564/18, 726/18,760/18, 1428/18, 1434/18, 1494/18, 1509/18, 1515/18, 1531/18,1591/18, 2090/18, 2637/18, 3101/18, 3240/18, 3304/18, 65/19
and 1330/19
Mr. Tejinder Singh for the appellant in ITXA No. 1022/19Mr. Suresh Kumar for the appellant in ITXA No.1386/14Mr. V.S. Hadade for the respondent in ITXA No.538/13
Mr. Atul Jasani for the respondent/s in ITXA No. 1605/17, 1662/17,2006/17, 564/18, 1494/18, 2637/18, 65/19 and 1022/19
Mr. Ruturaj H. Gurjar i/b Mihir Naniwadekar for the respondent/s inITXA Nos. 607/13 and 608/13
CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA &
NITIN JAMDAR, J.J.
DATED : 16[th] SEPTEMBER, 2019
P.C.
1.Learned Counsel appearing in support of these appeals, oninstructions, seek to withdraw the appeals. This for the reason thatthe tax effect involved in these appeals is less than the threshold limit
prescribed in CBDT Circular No.3/2018 dated 11[th] July, 2018 andrevised Circular No.17/2019, dated 8[th] August, 2019.
2. In the above view, all the appeals are disposed of aswithdrawn. Refund of Court fees as per rules.
(NITIN JAMDAR, J.) (M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.