Itxa/1061/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -Central Pune v. Shree Ostwal Builders Ltd
High Court
05 Nov 2014 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/1061/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -Central Pune v. Shree Ostwal Builders Ltd
Date of order
05 Nov 2014
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/1061/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -Central Pune v. Shree Ostwal Builders Ltd, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In such circumstances, in the light of this katkam k concession, this Appeal is dismissed as it does not raise any substantial questions of law.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
k
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1061 OF 2012
Commissioner of Income Tax-Central, Pune V/s.Shree Ostwal Builders Ltd.
...Appellant....Respondent.
Mr. Tejveer Singh for the Appellant.Ms. Beena Pillai for the Respondent.
CORAM:S.C. DHARMADHIKARI ANDA.A. SAYED, JJ.
DATED :5 NOVEMBER, 2014.
P.C.:
1This Appeal challenges the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 12[th] August, 2011. The Assessment Years are 2005-2006 and 2006-2007. The questions of law and termed as substantial are to be found at pages 5 and 6 of the paper book.
2Mr. Tejveer Singh appearing for the Revenue in support of this Appeal fairly concedes that these questions have already been answered against the Revenue and in favour of the Assessee in several Appeals by this Court. Some of the Appeals pertain to the same Assessee. In such circumstances, in the light of this
katkam
k
concession, this Appeal is dismissed as it does not raise any substantial questions of law.
(A.A. SAYED, J.)
(S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue