In Itxa/1065/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-8,Mum v. M/S S.m. Dyechem Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is, therefore, dismissed in limini with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1065 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax
..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s. S.M. Dyechem Ltd.
..Respondent.
Mr. J.S. Saluja for appellant.
None for respondent.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 31ST JULY, 2009.
P.C. :-
Heard learned counsel for the revenue. He does not dispute that the questions involved in the appeal revolves around the appreciation of evidence placed on record. In this view of the matter, no substantial question of law arise in this appeal. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed in limini with no order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
(V.C.DAGA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue