Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/1070/2010 Of The Director Of Income...

Itxa/1070/2010 Of The Director Of Income Tax (International Taxation) v. M/S. Scientific Atlanta Inc

High Court 25 Jan 2010 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/1070/2010 Of The Director Of Income Tax (International Taxation) v. M/S. Scientific Atlanta Inc
Date of order
25 Jan 2010
Assessment year(s)
1998-99
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Itxa/1070/2010 Of The Director Of Income Tax (International Taxation) v. M/S. Scientific Atlanta Inc, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: In view of the statement, the appeal does not raise any substantial question of law and is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2866 OF 2009 The Director of Income Tax(International Taxation) ..Appellant. V/s. M/s. Scientific Atlanta Inc. ..Respondent. Mr. Suresh Kumar for appellant. Mr. Prakash Shah i/b. PDS Legal for respondent. CORAM : DR. D.Y.CHANDRACHUD AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 25TH JANUARY, 2010 P.C. :- 1.Office objections are waived. Registry is directed to register the appeal. 2.The following question has been formulated in the appeal by the revenue against the order of the ITAT dated 3[rd] July, 2009 pertaining the assessment year 1998-99 :- “ Whether on the facts and the circumstances of the case, the ITAT was justified in holding that when duty is cast on the payer to pay tax at source, on failure on the part of the payee, no interest u/s.234B can be imposed on the payee assessee ignoring the fact that it is the liability of the payee to pay advance tax even on the amount which had not been deducted at source under section 195 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ? “ 2.Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Revenue states before the Court that the question is covered against the Revenue by the judgment of the Division Bench of this Court Director of Income Tax(International Taxation) V/s. NGC Network Asia LLC reported in (2009) 222CTR 86 (Bom). In view of the statement, the appeal does not raise any substantial question of law and is dismissed. (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (DR. D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan