Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/1074/2017 Of The Pr. Commissioner O...

Itxa/1074/2017 Of The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-1 Thane v. Ramprasad S. Agarwal

High Court 06 Sep 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/1074/2017 Of The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-1 Thane v. Ramprasad S. Agarwal
Date of order
06 Sep 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Itxa/1074/2017 Of The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-1 Thane v. Ramprasad S. Agarwal, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.

Decision: In the above view, the appeal is disposed of as withdrawn.Refund of Court fees as per rules.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1074 OF 2017 Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-1Thane .. Petitioner v/s. Ramprasad S. Agarwal .. Respondent Mr. Pritish Chatterjee i/b Mr. Sham Walve for the petitioner None for the respondent CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & NITIN JAMDAR, J.J. DATED : 6[th] SEPTEMBER, 2019 P.C. 1.Mr. Chatterjee, learned Counsel appearing in support of theappeal, on instructions, seeks to withdraw this appeal. This for thereason that the tax effect involved in this appeal is less than thethreshold limit prescribed in CBDT Circular No.3/2018 dated 11[th]July, 2018 and revised Circular No.17/2019, dated 8[th] August, 2019.2. In the above view, the appeal is disposed of as withdrawn.Refund of Court fees as per rules. (NITIN JAMDAR, J.) (M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan