Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/1082/2004 Of The Commissioner Of In...

Itxa/1082/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-4 v. M/S Bhilosa Tex-N-Twist Pvt.ltd

High Court 16 Oct 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/1082/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-4 v. M/S Bhilosa Tex-N-Twist Pvt.ltd
Date of order
16 Oct 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Itxa/1082/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-4 v. M/S Bhilosa Tex-N-Twist Pvt.ltd, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.

Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is disposed of with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1082 OF 2004 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1082 OF 2004 The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant. V/s. M/s.Bhilosa Tex-N-Twist Pvt.Ltd. ..Respondent. Mr.B.M.Chatterji with Mrs.P.P.Bhosale for appellant. Mr.A.K.Jasani for respondent. CORAM : F.I.REBELLO ANDJ.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 16TH OCTOBER, 2007. DATED : 16TH OCTOBER, 2007. P.C. :- P.C. :- Admit, on the following question of law :- " Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal erred in confirming the order of the CIT(A) and holding that the assessee is eligible for deductions under sections 80-HH, 80-I and 80-IA of the Act treating that the activity of texturising and twisting of the yarn is a manufacturing activity ? " 2. Counsel for the assessee clearly states that the issue as to what is the actual activity carried out has not been dealt with both by the assessing officer and the Appellate Authority and it is required to be decided. In the light of that, the order of the - = : 2 : = - Tribunal as also of the assessing officer are set aside and the matter is remanded back to the assessing officer for reconsideration and to dispose it of in accordance with law. 3. Accordingly, the appeal is disposed of with no order as to costs. (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan