Itxa/1082/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-4 v. M/S Bhilosa Tex-N-Twist Pvt.ltd
High Court
16 Oct 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/1082/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-4 v. M/S Bhilosa Tex-N-Twist Pvt.ltd
Date of order
16 Oct 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Itxa/1082/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-4 v. M/S Bhilosa Tex-N-Twist Pvt.ltd, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.
Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is disposed of with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1082 OF 2004
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1082 OF 2004
The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s.Bhilosa Tex-N-Twist Pvt.Ltd. ..Respondent.
Mr.B.M.Chatterji with Mrs.P.P.Bhosale for appellant.
Mr.A.K.Jasani for respondent.
CORAM : F.I.REBELLO ANDJ.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 16TH OCTOBER, 2007.
DATED : 16TH OCTOBER, 2007.
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
Admit, on the following question of law :-
" Whether on the facts and in the
circumstances of the case, the Tribunal
erred in confirming the order of the CIT(A)
and holding that the assessee is eligible
for deductions under sections 80-HH, 80-I
and 80-IA of the Act treating that the
activity of texturising and twisting of the
yarn is a manufacturing activity ? "
2. Counsel for the assessee clearly states that
the issue as to what is the actual activity carried out
has not been dealt with both by the assessing officer
and the Appellate Authority and it is required to be
decided. In the light of that, the order of the
- = : 2 : = -
Tribunal as also of the assessing officer are set aside
and the matter is remanded back to the assessing
officer for reconsideration and to dispose it of in
accordance with law.
3. Accordingly, the appeal is disposed of with
no order as to costs.
(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.