Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/1095/2007 Of The Commissioner Of In...

Itxa/1095/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Mumbai City-I v. M/S Reliable Holding Pvt Ltd

High Court 07 Aug 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/1095/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Mumbai City-I v. M/S Reliable Holding Pvt Ltd
Date of order
07 Aug 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/1095/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Mumbai City-I v. M/S Reliable Holding Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Accordingly, Appeal is dismissed as 5.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Rane IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1095 OF 2007 The Commissioner of Income-Tax,Mumbai, City-I Mumbai, City-I….AppellantV/s.M/s. Reliable Holding Pvt. Ltd. ….Respondent * * * * Ms. Swapna Gokhale I/by. Mr. Suresh Kumar, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Subhash Shetty, Advocate for the respondent. -CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA, &SANDEEP K. SHINDE, JJ. TUESDAY, 7TH AUGUST, 2018. P.C. : 1. This Appeal relates to Assessment Year 1995-96. 2. Ms. Gokhale, Learned Counsel appearing for the Revenue invited our attention to Circular No.3 of2018 dated 11[th] July, 2018 issued by the Central Boardfor Direct Tax (CBDT). The above Circular directs the Rane ITXA—1095-2007 (SR.902)7.8.2018 Officers of the Revenue not to file appeals to the HighCourt where the tax effect does not exceed Rs.50 lakhs.It also directs its Officers to withdraw/not press itspending appeals where the tax effect is less than Rs.50lakhs. This, of course, if it does not fall in the excludedclass of appeals listed therein. 3. In view of the Circular No.3 of 2018 dated11[th] July, 2018 issued by the CBDT, Ms. Gokhale,Learned Counsel appearing for the Revenue, oninstructions of Mr. Bansal, Assistant Commissioner ofIncome-Tax seeks to withdraw this Appeal. 4. withdrawn. Accordingly, Appeal is dismissed as 5. Refund of court-fees as per Rules. (SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J) (M.S. SANKLECHA, J) Digitally signedNeetaby NeetaShaileshShaileshSawantDate:Sawant2018.08.0912:15:39 +0530
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan