Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/1095/2009 Of The Commissioner Of In...

Itxa/1095/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-13,Mum v. M/S Raj Petroleum Products

High Court 14 Aug 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/1095/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-13,Mum v. M/S Raj Petroleum Products
Date of order
14 Aug 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/1095/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-13,Mum v. M/S Raj Petroleum Products, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Pithwa Engg.Works (2005) 276 ITR 519, the appeal is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1095 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant. V/s. M/s. Raj Petroleum Products ..Respondent. Mr. A.S. Shivsharan for appellant. Mr. A.K. Jasani for respondent. CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 14TH AUGUST, 2009. P.C. :- Heard learned counsel for the revenue. Since the tax effect in this appeal is less than Rs.4 lakhs and in view of the office Memorandum dated 5-6-2007 issued by the C.B.D.T. and judgments of this Court in CITV/s. Camco Colour Co. (2002) 254 I.T.R. 565 and CIT V/s. Pithwa Engg.Works (2005) 276 ITR 519, the appeal is dismissed. No order as to costs. (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan