In Itxa/1105/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 8, Mumbai v. M/S Elation Investment P Ltd, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.
Decision: Both appeals are, therefore, dismissed in limine with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The Commissioner of Income-tax-,... Appellant.
M/s.Elation Investment Pvt.Ltd.... Respondent.
Suresh Kumar for the appellant.
None for the respondent.
P.C. :
Heard learned counsel for the appellant.
2.The questions sought to be raised in these appeals revolve around concurrent findings of fact recorded by the C.I.T.(A) and confirmed the Tribunal. Considering the concurrent findings recorded on the basis of appreciation of evidence on record, we do not see any substantial question of law involved in these appeals. Both appeals are, therefore, dismissed in limine with no order as to costs.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue