Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/1105/2011 Of The Commissioner Of In...

Itxa/1105/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 19 Mumbai v. Bhikiben J. Oswal

High Court 16 Jun 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/1105/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 19 Mumbai v. Bhikiben J. Oswal
Date of order
16 Jun 2011
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/1105/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 19 Mumbai v. Bhikiben J. Oswal, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: DATED : 16TH JUNE, 2011 P.C. :- 1.Whether the Tribunal was justified in deleting the penalty levied under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, is the question raised in these appeals.

Decision: Both the appeals are dismissed with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

sas IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1111 OF 2011 The Commissioner of Income Tax-19 ..Appellant. V/s. Shri Rishi R. Oswal (HUF) ..Respondent. INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1105 OF 2011 The Commissioner of Income Tax-19 ..Appellant. V/s.Ms. Bhikiben J. Oswal ..Respondent. Mr. A.S. Shivsharan for the appellant in both the appeals.Mr. B.V. Zaveri for the respondent in both the appeals. CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND SMT. R.P.SONDURBALDOTA JJ. DATED : 16TH JUNE, 2011 P.C. :- 1.Whether the Tribunal was justified in deleting the penalty levied under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, is the question raised in these appeals. 2.The Tribunal in para 6 of its judgment has given detailed reasons for coming to the conclusion that the sale and purchase of the shares seems to be genuine and cannot be considered to be bogus transactions. As the decision of the Tribunal is based on finding of fact, in our opinion, no question of law arises from the order of the Tribunal. Both the appeals are dismissed with no order as to costs. (SMT. R.P.SONDURBALDOTA, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan