Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/1109/2009 Of The Commissionser Of I...

Itxa/1109/2009 Of The Commissionser Of Income Tax -1 Mumbai v. M/S. Awaita Psroperties P Ltd

High Court 31 Jul 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/1109/2009 Of The Commissionser Of Income Tax -1 Mumbai v. M/S. Awaita Psroperties P Ltd
Date of order
31 Jul 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Itxa/1109/2009 Of The Commissionser Of Income Tax -1 Mumbai v. M/S. Awaita Psroperties P Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The appeal is, therefore, dismissed in limini with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1109 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant. V/s. M/s. Awaita Properties Pvt. Ltd. ..Respondent. Mr. Suresh Kumar for appellant. Mr. R.B. Bhujle with K.V. Bhujle for respondent. CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 31ST JULY, 2009. P.C. :- Heard learned counsel for the parties. The question sought to be raised in this appeal relates to the penalty under section 271(1) (c) consequent to the assessee’s failure to offer the income under the correct head of income. The Tribunal after considering the the factual aspects came to the conclusion that there is no concealment on the part of the assessee. This finding of fact is based on the material available on record and correct appreciation thereof. In this view of the matter, we find no substantial question of law is involved in this appeal. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed in limini with no order as to costs. (J.P.DEVADHAR,J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan