In Itxa/1109/2009 Of The Commissionser Of Income Tax -1 Mumbai v. M/S. Awaita Psroperties P Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is, therefore, dismissed in limini with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1109 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax
..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s. Awaita Properties Pvt. Ltd.
..Respondent.
Mr. Suresh Kumar for appellant.
Mr. R.B. Bhujle with K.V. Bhujle for respondent.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 31ST JULY, 2009.
P.C. :-
Heard learned counsel for the parties. The question sought to be raised in this appeal relates to the penalty under section 271(1) (c) consequent to the assessee’s failure to offer the income under the correct head of income. The Tribunal after considering the the factual aspects came to the conclusion that there is no concealment on the part of the assessee. This finding of fact is based on the material available on record and correct appreciation thereof. In this view of the matter, we find no substantial question of law is involved in this appeal. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed in limini with no order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
(V.C.DAGA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.