Itxa/1110/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-3,Mum v. M/S Star Chemicals (Bom) Pvt Ltd
High Court
14 Aug 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/1110/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-3,Mum v. M/S Star Chemicals (Bom) Pvt Ltd
Date of order
14 Aug 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/1110/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-3,Mum v. M/S Star Chemicals (Bom) Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 2.The appeal is, therefore, dismissed in limini with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1110 OF 2009ANDINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1153 OF2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax
..Appellant.
V/s.
Star Chemicals (Bom) Pvt. Ltd.
..Respondent.
Mr. Vimal Gupta for appellant.
Mr. Deepak Tralshawala with V.S. Hadade for respondent.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 14TH AUGUST, 2009.
P.C. :-
1.Heard learned counsel for the revenue. The question sought to be raised in the above appeals relates to the title which was acquired by adverse possession which did not involve any acquisition costs. The Tribunal was right in confirming order of the CIT(A) wherein view is taken that for want of acquisition cost, capital gain tax would not arise. The view taken is a reasonable and proper view. In this view of the matter, we do not see any substantial question of law arise in the appeal.
2.The appeal is, therefore, dismissed in limini with no order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(V.C.DAGA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.