In Itxa/1112/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-20, Bombay v. Smt. Meena Arora, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is dismissed in limini with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1112 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax
..Appellant.
V/s.
Smt. Meena Arora
..Respondent.
Mr. P.S. Sahadevan for appellant.
Mr. K. Goptal & Jitendra Singh for respondent.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 14TH AUGUST, 2009.
P.C. :-
Heard learned counsel for the revenue. The question sought to raised in the above appeal revolves round the appreciation of evidence and findings of fact recorded by the Tribunal. We do not find any fault in the findings recorded by the Tribunal. In this view of the matter, no substantial question of law arise in the appeal. The appeal is dismissed in limini with no order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(V.C.DAGA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue