Itxa/1112/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central ) Pune v. M/S Praj Industries Ltd
High Court
12 Mar 2013 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/1112/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central ) Pune v. M/S Praj Industries Ltd
Date of order
12 Mar 2013
Assessment year(s)
2007-08
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itxa/1112/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central ) Pune v. M/S Praj Industries Ltd, the High Court (2013) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.286 OF 2013
The Commissioner of Income Tax(Central) Pune..Appellant.V/s.M/s. Praj Industries Ltd...Respondent.
Mr. Tejveer Singh, for the Appellant.Mr. Mihir Naniwadekar, for the Respondent.
P.C:-
CORAM: J.P.DEVADHAR & M.S.SANKLECHA,JJ.DATE : 12[th] MARCH, 2013.
In this Appeal by the Revenue for the Assessment Year 2007-08, following question has been raised for our consideration.
Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal was correct in holding that assessee is eligible to claim deduction under Section 10A/10B on enhanced profit due to statutory disallowances?
2Since the Tribunal has allowed the claim of the Respondent-
Assessee by following the decision of this Court in the matter of CIT v/s.
Gem Plus Jewellery India Ltd. reported in 330 ITR 175, we see no reason to entertain the proposed question of law.
S.R.JOSHI
(M.S.SANKLECHA,J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.