Itxa/1118/2004 Of Arunkumar R. Patil v. Asst. Commissioner Of Income-Tax Cir-1 (2), Thane
High Court
06 Oct 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/1118/2004 Of Arunkumar R. Patil v. Asst. Commissioner Of Income-Tax Cir-1 (2), Thane
Date of order
06 Oct 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Itxa/1118/2004 Of Arunkumar R. Patil v. Asst. Commissioner Of Income-Tax Cir-1 (2), Thane, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Decision: Appeal is, therefore, rejected.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
- 1 -
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
O.O.C.J.
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1118 OF 2004
-----------------------------------------------------
Office Notes, Office
Memoranda of Coram, Court’s or Judge’s
appearances, Court’s orders
order or directions
-----------------------------------------------------
¦ Mr.A.K.Jasani i/b S.N.Inamdar for
¦ the Appellant.
¦ Mr.S.C.Bhatnagar with
¦ Mr.N.R.Prajapati for the Respondent.
¦
¦ CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH &
¦ J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.
¦ DATED:6TH OCTOBER, 2008
P.C.:
The findings of the tribunal turn on
appreciation of evidence on record.
They are essentially the findings of
fact. No substantial question of
law arises. Appeal is, therefore,
rejected.
(D.K.DESHMUKH, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue