In Itxa/11/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Iv, Pune v. The Solapur Nagari Audyogik Sahakari Bank Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal.
Issue: P.C. :- 1.The above appeal was admitted on the following substantial question of law:- " Whether on the facts and in law the Tribunal was right in holding that interest on KVP amounting to Rs.26,100/ held as investment and not for compliance of statutory provision but out of voluntary reserves was e...
Decision: The appeal is, therefore, dismissed in limini with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.11 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax
..Appellant.
V/s.The Solapur Nagari Audyogik Sahakari Bank Ltd.
..Respondent.
Mr. Vimal Gupta for appellant.
None for respondent.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 31ST JULY, 2009.
P.C. :-
1.The above appeal was admitted on the following substantial question
of law:-
" Whether on the facts and in law the Tribunal was right in holding that interest on KVP amounting to Rs.26,100/ held as investment and not for compliance of statutory provision but out of voluntary reserves was eligible for deduction under sec. 80P (2)(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ? "
2.The issue sought to be raised is covered by the Division Bench
judgment of this Court in the case of CIT V/s. The Solapur Nagari AudyogikSahakari Bank Ltd. in Income Tax Appeal No.46 OF 2008 decided on 16th June, 2009. In this view of the matter, no substantial question of law arise in this appeal. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed in limini with no order as to costs.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.