In Itxa/1121/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -I Pune v. Bhima Sahakarisakhar Karkhana Ltd, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In this view of the matter, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
sas
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1121 OF 2011
The Commissioner of Income Tax-I, Pune
..Appellant.
V/s.
Bhima Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd...Respondent.
Mr. Vimal Gupta for the appellant.
Mr. Mihir Naniwadekar for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND
A.R. JOSHI, JJ.
DATED : 25TH JANUARY, 2012
P.C. :-
Counsel for the parties state that the question raised in this appeal is covered against the revenue by the decision of this court in the case of CIT V/s. Kisanveer Satara Sakar Karkhana Ltd. [Income Tax Appeal No.930 of 2008] decided on 30th June, 2009. In this view of the matter, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
(A.R. JOSHI, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue