In Itxa/1128/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,City-24, Mumbai v. D.y.samant, the High Court (2005) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn withliberty to apply for refund of court fee as may bepermissible in law with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (Ldg.) NO. 991 OF 2002
The Commissioner of Income-tax.... Appellant.V/s.D.Y.Samant.... Respondent.A.S.Rao i/b. Pankaj Kapoor for the appellant.CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED : 12th September, 2005.P.C. :----.On the motion made by learned counsel forthe petitioner, petitioner is allowed to withdrawthis appeal. Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn withliberty to apply for refund of court fee as may bepermissible in law with no order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)(V.C.DAGA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue