Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/1130/2016 Of Principal Commissioner...

Itxa/1130/2016 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-33 Mumbai v. Krishna Tandon (Huf)

High Court 23 Jan 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/1130/2016 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-33 Mumbai v. Krishna Tandon (Huf)
Date of order
23 Jan 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/1130/2016 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-33 Mumbai v. Krishna Tandon (Huf), the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1130 OF 2016 Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-33 .. Appellant v/s. Krishna Tandon (HUF).. Respondent Mr. Arvind Pinto for the appellant None for the respondent P.C. CORAM : AKIL KURESHI & M.S. SANKLECHA, J.J. DATED : 23[rd] JANUARY, 2019 1.The appeal is filed by the Revenue challenging the judgment ofthe Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ("the Tribunal" for short) holdingthat the receipts of the respondent assessee arising out of sale of sharesare the assessee's capital gain. The respondent assessee is an HUF. Identical question arose in case of the individual who happens to be the Karta of the present respondent HUF. We have passed a detailedorder in Income Tax Appeal No.1146 of 2016 dismissing the Revenue'sappeal. 2.Facts being identical, without recording separate reasons, this taxappeal is also dismissed. (M.S. SANKLECHA, J.) (AKIL KURESHI, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan