In Itxa/1134/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -5 ,Mumbai v. M/S Sunraj Diamond Exports Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Hence appeal is dismissed in limini with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.2453 OF 2007
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.2453 OF 2007
The Comissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s.Sunraj Diamonds Exports Ltd. ..Respondent.
Mr.R.Ashokan for appellant.
None for respondent.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA ANDJ.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 7TH MAY, 2009.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 7TH MAY, 2009.
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
1. Heard learned counsel for the revenue. In
view of the findings recorded by the Tribunal in para
5 of its order wherein the Tribunal has recorded that
all the necessary particulars relevant for the
assessment were disclosed by the assesee with the
annual accounts along with returns and the reopening
of the assessment in the case was admittedly after 4
years. Having seen the findings of fact recorded by
the Tribunal, we see no substantial question of law
arise in the appeal warranting the admission of the
appeal. Hence appeal is dismissed in limini with no
order as to costs.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.