Itxa/1142/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-Iii.thane v. Shivkrupa Majur Kamgar Sahakari Sanstha Ltd
High Court
12 Feb 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/1142/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-Iii.thane v. Shivkrupa Majur Kamgar Sahakari Sanstha Ltd
Date of order
12 Feb 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/1142/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-Iii.thane v. Shivkrupa Majur Kamgar Sahakari Sanstha Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1142 OF 2004The Commissioner of Income Tax...Appellant.Vs.M/s. Shivkrupa Majur KamgarSahkar Sanstha Ltd...Respondent.Mr.B.M.Chatterji with Ms.P.P.Bhosale andMr.P.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant.None for the Respondent.CORAM : F.I. REBELLO &R.S. MOHITE, JJ.DATED : 12TH FEBRUARY,2008.PC :1. As the tax incidence is less than Rs.4.00 lakhs, thelearned counsel seeks leave to withdraw the appeal.Appeal dismissed as withdrawn. Refund of court fees asper rules. Certified copy expedited.2. The question of law, if any, is kept open forconsideration in appropriate case.(R.S. MOHITE, J.)(F.I. REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue