Itxa/1144/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 1 Mumbai v. M/S. Bombay Gas Co Ltd
High Court
06 Jun 2011 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/1144/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 1 Mumbai v. M/S. Bombay Gas Co Ltd
Date of order
06 Jun 2011
Assessment year(s)
2001-02, 1996-97, 1997-98
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Itxa/1144/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 1 Mumbai v. M/S. Bombay Gas Co Ltd, the High Court (2011) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: In this view of the matter, we see no merit in the appeal and the same is dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1144 OF 2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax-1
..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s. Bombay Gas Co. Ltd...Respondent.
Mr. Suresh Kumar for appellant.
None for respondent.
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND MRS. R.P.SONDURBALDOTA JJ.DATED : 6TH JUNE, 2011
P.C. :-
In the present case, the ITAT has allowed the appeal filed by the assessee relating to the assessment year 2001-02 by following the decision of the ITAT in the assessee's own case for AY 1996-97 and AY 1997-98. Counsel for the revenue fairly states that the decisions of the Tribunal for AY 1996-97 and AY 1997-98 have been accepted by the revenue. As the decision of the Tribunal for earlier years has attained finality, there is no reason to entertain the present appeal, especially when no fault is pointed out in the order passed by the Tribunal for the earlier years. In this view of the matter, we see no merit in the appeal and the same is dismissed with no order as to costs.
(MRS. R.P.SONDURBALDOTA, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.