Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/1144/2012 Of The Commissioner Of In...

Itxa/1144/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 6 v. M/S.mandhana Industries Pvt.ltd

High Court 08 Oct 2014 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/1144/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 6 v. M/S.mandhana Industries Pvt.ltd
Date of order
08 Oct 2014
Assessment year(s)
2004-05
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Itxa/1144/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 6 v. M/S.mandhana Industries Pvt.ltd, the High Court (2014) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

srk IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1144 OF 2012 The Commissioner of Income Tax 6 ..Appellant -Versus-M/s. Mandhana Industries Pvt.Ltd. ..Respondent Mr. Suresh Kumar for the appellant.Mr. Jas Sanghavi with Ms. Megha Bansal i/by M/s. PDS Legal for the respondent. CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARIAND A.K. MENON, JJ. DATE :- 8[th] October, 2014 P.C.: In this appeal which pertains to the assessment year 2004-05 the revenue is impugning the order of the Income tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai Bench dated 18[th] April, 2012. There were cross appeals and the Tribunal has vide dealing with both appeals eventually directed that the assessing officer shall give an opportunity to the assess to produce the relevant materials for the purposes of the claim under section 80HHC of the Income tax Act, 1961. The ultimate direction in para 11 at page 74 of the paper-book and issued by the Tribunal has since been followed and abided by the assessing officer. He has after giving the requisite opportunity to the parties passed a fresh order on 26[th] March, 2014. 2.In the light of the same, entertaining this appeal and considering the questions framed at pages 3 and 4 of the paper-book would be purely academic. Since more so, a part of the claim has been disallowed and it would open for the assessee to challenge the order of the assessment officer in further proceeding. Similarly, if in relation to any other deduction or claim, the revenue is aggrieved it can adopt such proceeding as are permissible in law. 3.In these circumstances, by keeping open the questions of law for being raised before an appropriate authority at an appropriate stage, we dispose of this appeal. 4.The copy of the assessment order together with notice of demand is taken on record and marked 'X' for identification. (A.K. MENON, J.) (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan