Case Law › High Court › Itxa/1151/2008 Of The Commissioner Of In...

Itxa/1151/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -4, Mumbai v. M/S Shree Rajasthan Texchem Ltd. , Mumbai

High Court 30 Jul 2018 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

30 Jul 2018

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/1151/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -4, Mumbai v. M/S Shree Rajasthan Texchem Ltd. , Mumbai, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Rane IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1151 OF 2008 Commissioner of Income-Tax-4 ….AppellantV/s.M/s. Shree Rajasthan Texchem Ltd. ….Respondent None for the appellant. * * * * CORAM :- M.S. SANKLECHA, &SANDEEP K. SHINDE, JJ.DATE : 30TH JULY, 2018. P.C. :- 1. None appeared in support of the Appeal whenit was first called out. It was kept back. On being calledthe second time, again none appears in support of theAppeal. 2. It appears, the appellant is not desirous ofprosecuting this Appeal. This particularly in view of thefact that Advocate and parties were put to notice on 20[th]July, 2018 that this Appeal would be taken up forconsideration today. Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution. (SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J) (M.S. SANKLECHA, J) NeetaDigitally signedby NeetaShaileshShailesh SawantDate: 2018.07.31Sawant11:25:01 +0530

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.