In Itxa/1154/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-3,Mum v. M/S Vanita Bhandari, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is, therefore, dismissed in limini with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1154 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax
..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s. Vanita Bhandari
..Respondent.
Mr. Vimal Gupta for appellant.
None for respondent.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 4TH AUGUST, 2009.
P.C. :-
Heard learned counsel for the revenue. He fairly states that the issue sought to be raised in the appeal is covered by the judgment of this Court in Income Tax Appeal No.108 of 2009 [The Commissioner of Income Tax V/s. Mrs. P. S. Agarwal] decided on 18[th] February, 2009 (unreported). In this view of the matter no substantial question of law is involved in the appeal. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed in limini with no order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
(V.C.DAGA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue