Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/1156/2012 Of The Commissioner Of In...

Itxa/1156/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 6 v. M/S. Heinz India (P) Ltd

High Court 12 Mar 2013 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/1156/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 6 v. M/S. Heinz India (P) Ltd
Date of order
12 Mar 2013
Assessment year(s)
2006-07
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/1156/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 6 v. M/S. Heinz India (P) Ltd, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: 3Accordingly, appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1156 OF 2012 The Commissioner of Income Tax-6..Appellant.V/s.M/s. Heinz India (P) Ltd...Respondent. Mr. Suresh Kumar, for the Appellant.None for the Respondent. P.C:- CORAM: J.P.DEVADHAR & M.S.SANKLECHA,JJ.DATE : 12[th] MARCH, 2013. In this Appeal by the Revenue for the Assessment Year 2006-07 following question has been raised for our consideration. Whether on the facts and in circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal was correct to have remitted the matter of disallowance under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act 1961, back to the Assessing Officer whilst holding that computation under Rule 8D of the Income Tax Rules is not applicable for AY 2006-07 following the guidelines given by the High Court in the case of Godrej & Boyce Manufacturing Company Limited v/s. DCIT (2010) 328 ITR 81 (Bom)”? Since the Tribunal by the impugned order has restored the matter to the file of the Assessing Officer to decide the issue a fresh, keeping in view various decision including decision of this Court in the matter of Godrej & Boyce Manufacturing Company Limited v/s. DCIT (2010) 328 ITR 81 , we see no reason to entertain the proposed question of law. 3Accordingly, appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. (M.S.SANKLECHA,J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan