Itxa/1158/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii Thanei v. M/S. Anubhav Market Research And Development Pvt,. Ltd,. Thane
High Court
10 Aug 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/1158/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii Thanei v. M/S. Anubhav Market Research And Development Pvt,. Ltd,. Thane
Date of order
10 Aug 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/1158/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii Thanei v. M/S. Anubhav Market Research And Development Pvt,. Ltd,. Thane, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: All the appeals are, therefore, dismissed in limini with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1157 OF 2009ANDINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1158 OF 2009ANDINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1181 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax
..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s. Anubhav Market Research & Development Pvt. Ltd...Respondent.Mr. Bhatnagar with N.R. Prajapati for appellant.
Mr. K. Gopal with Jitendra Singh.for respondent.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 10TH AUGUST, 2009.
P.C. :-
1.Heard learned counsel for the revenue and learned counsel for the respondent-assessee. The issue sought to be raised in the above appeals relates to the transactions between M/s.Atul Ltd., M/s.Amal Products and the assessee. In the case of M/s. Atul Ltd., the Tribunal has held that the transaction between the Atul Industries and M/s. Anubhav Market Research and Development (P) Ltd. i.e. the assessee is also the same genuine transactions and the Tribunal has taken into account the factual aspects and also went on to record the findings that the view taken by the CIT was correct in law. Under these circumstances, considering the findings recorded by both the authorities below, we find that it is based on appreciation of evidence and no fault can be found with the same. In this view of the matter, no substantial question of law arise in the above appeals. All the appeals are, therefore, dismissed in limini with no order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(V.C.DAGA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.