Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/1166/2008 Of The Commissioner Of In...

Itxa/1166/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -18, Mumbai v. M/S B. Brothers Decorators

High Court 18 Nov 2008 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/1166/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -18, Mumbai v. M/S B. Brothers Decorators
Date of order
18 Nov 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Itxa/1166/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -18, Mumbai v. M/S B. Brothers Decorators, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: The appeal is allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORIGINAL SIDE ORIGINAL SIDE INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1166 OF 2008 ------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes,Office : Memoranda of Coram, : Court’s or Judge’s orders appearances,Court ’s : orders or directions & : Prothonotary’s orders. : ------------------------------------------------------------ Mr K. R. Chaudhari, Advocate for the Appellant. CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN and V.C.DAGA, JJ. CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN and V.C.DAGA, JJ. DATED : 18TH NOVEMBER, 2008. DATED : 18TH NOVEMBER, 2008. DATED : 18TH NOVEMBER, 2008. P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant. 2. The learned counsel for the Appellant contends that as the tax effect is less than Rs.4,00,000/-, he seeks leave to withdraw the above appeal. The appeal is allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such. 3. Proper court fee be refunded in the above appeal as per rules. (V.C. DAGA,J.) (DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (V.C. DAGA,J.) (DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan