Itxa/1166/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -18, Mumbai v. M/S B. Brothers Decorators
High Court
18 Nov 2008 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/1166/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -18, Mumbai v. M/S B. Brothers Decorators
Date of order
18 Nov 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Itxa/1166/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -18, Mumbai v. M/S B. Brothers Decorators, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: The appeal is allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORIGINAL SIDE
ORIGINAL SIDE
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1166 OF 2008
-------------------------------------------------------------
Office Notes,Office :
Memoranda of Coram, : Court’s or Judge’s orders
appearances,Court ’s :
orders or directions & :
Prothonotary’s orders. :
------------------------------------------------------------
Mr K. R. Chaudhari, Advocate for the
Appellant.
CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN and V.C.DAGA, JJ.
CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN
and V.C.DAGA, JJ.
DATED : 18TH NOVEMBER, 2008.
DATED : 18TH NOVEMBER, 2008.
DATED : 18TH NOVEMBER, 2008.
P.C.:
P.C.:
1. Heard the learned counsel for the
appellant.
2. The learned counsel for the
Appellant contends that as the tax effect is
less than Rs.4,00,000/-, he seeks leave to
withdraw the above appeal. The appeal is
allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such.
3. Proper court fee be refunded in the
above appeal as per rules.
(V.C. DAGA,J.) (DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(V.C. DAGA,J.) (DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.