Case Law › High Court › Itxa/1168/2007 Of The Commissioner Of In...

Itxa/1168/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-Iii v. M/S Sherai Engineering Pvt.ltd

High Court 11 Jul 2018 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

11 Jul 2018

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/1168/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-Iii v. M/S Sherai Engineering Pvt.ltd, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: 3.Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1168 OF 2007 The Commissioner of Income Tax v/s. M/s. Sherai Engineering Pvt. Ltd. .. Appellants ..Respondent None for the appellants None for the respondent CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.J. DATED : 11[th] JULY, 2018. P.C. 1.This appeal was on board day after yesterday and yesterday. The appellants were not representing on both the days. However, inview of inclement weather, this appeal was adjourned both day-before-yesterday and yesterday. Today when the appeal is called out, noneappeared in support of the appeal. 2.It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the present appeal. This is more particularly so as the parties and advocateare put to notice on 29[th] June, 2018 that this appeal would be taken upfor consideration on 9[th] July, 2018. 3.Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. (SANDEEP K. SHINDE J.) (M.S. SANKLECHA, J.) Digitally signedUdayby Uday ShivajiJagtapShivajiDate:2018.07.1317:47:35 +0530Jagtap 1 of 1

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.