Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/1170/2011 Of The Commissioner Of In...

Itxa/1170/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -4 Mumbai v. Kamadgiri Synthetics Ltd

High Court 19 Jul 2011 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/1170/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -4 Mumbai v. Kamadgiri Synthetics Ltd
Date of order
19 Jul 2011
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Itxa/1170/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -4 Mumbai v. Kamadgiri Synthetics Ltd, the High Court (2011) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Issue: DATED : 19TH JULY, 2011 P.C. :- 1.Whether the ITAT was justified in holding that the assessee was entitled to deduction under Section 80IB of the Income Tax Act, 1961, is the question raised in this appeal.

Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

sas IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1170 OF 2011 The Commissioner of Income Tax-4, Mumbai ..Appellant. V/s. M/s. Kamadgiri Synthetics Ltd. ..Respondent. Mr. Vimal Gupta for the appellant. Ms. Vasanti B. Patel for the respondent. CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND A.A.SAYED, JJ. DATED : 19TH JULY, 2011 P.C. :- 1.Whether the ITAT was justified in holding that the assessee was entitled to deduction under Section 80IB of the Income Tax Act, 1961, is the question raised in this appeal. 2.The ITAT has allowed the claim of the assessee by recording that new weaving machines were installed during the period relevant to the assessment years 1992-93 to 1997-98 wherein it was held that the assessee was entitled to 80IA deduction. Admittedly, the appeals filed by the revenue against the orders of the ITAT for the assessment years 1992-93 to 1997-98 have been disposed off and the orders of ITAT have attained finality. In these circumstances, allowing deduction under Section 80IB following its order in the earlier years cannot be faulted. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. (A.A. SAYED, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan