In Itxa/1173/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-18,Mum v. Meher Akhe Singh, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.
Decision: With this clarification appeal is disposed of with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1173 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income-tax-,
... Appellant.
Meher Akhe Singh.
... Respondent.
Subhash S. Shetty for the respondent.
P.C. :
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2.The Tribunal has already given directions to determine the issue on the basis of the principles extracted in para-18 of the impugned judgment. Suffice it to clarify that these directions are given to the assessing officer. With this clarification appeal is disposed of with no order as to costs.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue