Case Law › High Court › Itxa/1174/2019 Of Pr. Commissioner Of In...

Itxa/1174/2019 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central - 4 v. M/S The Phoenix Mills Ltd

High Court 09 Mar 2018 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

09 Mar 2018

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Itxa/1174/2019 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central - 4 v. M/S The Phoenix Mills Ltd, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 306/2017WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 404/2017WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 406/2017WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 412/2017WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 415/2017WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 419/2017WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 541/2017WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 544/2017WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 545/2017WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 549/2017WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 572/2017WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 648/2017WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 686/2017WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 806/2017WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 807/2017WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 701/2017WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 817/2017WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 834/2017WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 955/2017WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 1015/2017WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 1037/2017WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 1057/2017WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 1066/2017WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 1083/2017WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 1212/2017WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 1600/2017WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 1937/2017WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 1939/2017WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 1974/2017WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 1987/2017WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 2486/2017WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 2978/2017WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 3017/2017 O R D E R Perused Praecipe and contents mentioned therein. Heard learned Counsel. On considering contents of Praecipe, time to remove office objections on aforesaid matter, if not dismissed/rejected, is further extended for period of 4 weeks, failing matter to stand rejected under the provision of O.S. Rule, 986. Date : 05/04/2018 Prothonotary and Senior Master

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.