In Itxa/1175/2018 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 9 v. M/S. Grindwell Nortan Ltd, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 695/2017WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 706/2017WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 707/2017
WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 708/2017WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 709/2017WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 810/2017WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 2807/2017WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 2808/2017WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 2809/2017WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 2855/2017WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 2856/2017WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 2857/2017
O R D E R
Perused Praecipe and contents mentioned therein. Heard learned Counsel.On considering contents of Praecipe, time to remove office objections on aforesaidmatter, if not dismissed/rejected, is further extended for period of 4 weeks, failingmatter to stand rejected under the provision of O.S. Rule, 986.
Date : 22/03/2018
Prothonotary and Senior Master
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.