Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/1175/2018 Of The Commissioner Of In...

Itxa/1175/2018 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 9 v. M/S. Grindwell Nortan Ltd

High Court 22 Feb 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/1175/2018 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 9 v. M/S. Grindwell Nortan Ltd
Date of order
22 Feb 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/1175/2018 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 9 v. M/S. Grindwell Nortan Ltd, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 695/2017WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 706/2017WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 707/2017 WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 708/2017WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 709/2017WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 810/2017WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 2807/2017WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 2808/2017WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 2809/2017WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 2855/2017WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 2856/2017WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 2857/2017 O R D E R Perused Praecipe and contents mentioned therein. Heard learned Counsel.On considering contents of Praecipe, time to remove office objections on aforesaidmatter, if not dismissed/rejected, is further extended for period of 4 weeks, failingmatter to stand rejected under the provision of O.S. Rule, 986. Date : 22/03/2018 Prothonotary and Senior Master
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan