Itxa/1176/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii v. M/S Citygold Managemnet Services Pvt. Ltd
High Court
21 Dec 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/1176/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii v. M/S Citygold Managemnet Services Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
21 Dec 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/1176/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii v. M/S Citygold Managemnet Services Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Priya Soparkar 3.Accordingly, all these Appeals are dismissed as not pressed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
Priya Soparkar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.6164 OF 2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax 21… Appellant V/s.
Shri Anil Kumar Malhotra … Respondent
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1176 OF 2013
The Commissioner of Income Tax-Central-III … Appellant
V/s.
M/s Citygold Management Services Pvt. Ltd. … Respondent
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1195 OF 2015
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-3… Appellant
V/s.Shapoorji Palloonji & Co. Ltd. … Respondent
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1210 OF 2015
The Commissioner of Income Tax- Central III … Appellant V/s.M/s Cello Thermoware Ltd. … Respondent
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1247 OF 2015
Pr. Commissioner of Income-Tax-2
V/s.Shri Paras D. Gundecha
… Appellant
… Respondent
Priya Soparkar
2
36, 38,43 to 45, 80 itxa-o
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1612 OF 2018
Pr. Commissioner of Income-Tax-8
V/s.Zenriba Estate & Investments Pvt. Ltd.
… Appellant
… Respondent
---
Mr.Suresh Kumar for the Appellants.
Mr.Rahul Hakani i/by Mr.Ajay R. Singh for the Respondent inITXA No.6164 of 2010.
Mr.Atul Jasani for the Respondent in ITXA No.1176 of 2013,1195 of 2015.
Ms.Vasanti Patel for the Respondent in ITXA No.1210 of 2015.Ms.Aasifa Khan for the Respondent in ITXA No.1247 of 2015.Mr.B.V.Jhaveri for the Respondent in ITXA No.1612 of 2018.
---
CORAM : AKIL KURESHI AND
M.S.SANKLECHA, JJ.
DATE : DECEMBER 21, 2018.
P.C.:-
1.These Appeals under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961
(the Act) challenge the orders passed by the Income Tax AppellateTribunal (the Tribunal).
2.Mr.Suresh Kumar, learned Counsel appearing for the Revenue
states that he has been instructed not to press these appeals. This forthe reason that the tax effect in each of these appeals is less thanRs.50 lakhs as provided in CBDT Circular No.3 of 2018 dated 11[th]July, 2018.
Priya Soparkar
3.Accordingly, all these Appeals are dismissed as not pressed.
4.Refund of Court Fees, as per Rules.
(M.S.SANKLECHA,J.)
(AKIL KURESHI,J.)
….
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue