Case Law › High Court › Itxa/1177/2013 Of Anil Kumar R. Bansal v...

Itxa/1177/2013 Of Anil Kumar R. Bansal v. Asstt. Commissioner Of Income Tax-13(3)

High Court 20 Sep 2021 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

20 Sep 2021

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/1177/2013 Of Anil Kumar R. Bansal v. Asstt. Commissioner Of Income Tax-13(3), the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYDigitallysigned byPURTIORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONPURTIPRASADPRASADPARABPARABDate:2021.09.2115:18:39+0530INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1177 OF 2013 Anil Kumar R. Bansal V/s.Assistant Commissioner ofIncome Tax – 13 (3) ….Appellant ….Respondent Mr. Sameer G. Dalal for Appellant.None for Respondent. ----- ----- CORAM : K.R. SHRIRAM &M.S. KARNIK, JJ. DATED : 20[th] SEPTEMBER 2021 P.C. : 1.Mr. Dalal seeks leave to withdraw the appeal. 2.Appeal dismissed as withdrawn. 3. Refund of court fee, if any, be paid in accordance with rules. (M.S. KARNIK, J.) (K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.