Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/119/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Itxa/119/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 5 Mumbai v. West Coast Roller Mills Ltd

High Court 06 Jun 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/119/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 5 Mumbai v. West Coast Roller Mills Ltd
Date of order
06 Jun 2011
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/119/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 5 Mumbai v. West Coast Roller Mills Ltd, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: DATED : 6TH JUNE, 2011 P.C. :- 1.Whether, the Tribunal was justified in law in affirming the order of the CIT(A) in deleting the addition of Rs.8,58,500/- and interest thereon, on account of cash credit received from ten persons, is the question raised in this appeal.

Decision: In the result, we see no merit in the appeal and accordingly the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.119 OF 2010 Commissioner of Income Tax-5 ..Appellant. V/s. M/s. West Coast Roller Mills Ltd. ..Respondent. Ms. Padma Divakar for appellant. Mr. Pankaj Toprani for respondent. CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND MRS. R.P.SONDURBALDOTA JJ. DATED : 6TH JUNE, 2011 P.C. :- 1.Whether, the Tribunal was justified in law in affirming the order of the CIT(A) in deleting the addition of Rs.8,58,500/- and interest thereon, on account of cash credit received from ten persons, is the question raised in this appeal. 2.Perusal of the order passed by the CIT(A) as also the order passed by the ITAT shows that before the CIT(A), the assessee had submitted loan confirmation from ten creditors wherein the correct addresses of the creditors as also the bank cheque number and old Pan 2 itxa119-10 number were given to show that the loans were genuine. The CIT(A) has recorded a finding of fact that the loans were received more than 18 years back and in view of the long gap, the assessee's inability in furnishing the current PAN Nos. can be appreciated. Moreover, CIT(A) has recorded a finding of fact that if the assessing officer doubted the genuineness of the confirmations, he should have made necessary inquiries from the creditors as their addresses were available on record. In the absence of any such inquiry undertaken by the assessing officer, the decision of the CIT(A) as well as ITAT in holding that the assessee has discharged the burden of establishing that the loans were genuine cannot be faulted. In the result, we see no merit in the appeal and accordingly the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. (MRS. R.P.SONDURBALDOTA, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan