Itxa/1199/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -3, Mumbai v. Videocon Appliances Ltd
High Court
30 Mar 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/1199/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -3, Mumbai v. Videocon Appliances Ltd
Date of order
30 Mar 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itxa/1199/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -3, Mumbai v. Videocon Appliances Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Mr.Vimal Gupta with Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for theAppellant.
Mr. F.V. Irani with Ms. Neeta Rajda i/by DSRAssociates for the Respondent.
CORAM : F.I. REBELLO &R.S. MOHITE, JJ.DATE : 30th March, 2009.
PC :
1. Revenue is in appeal on the following question.
India undertaking, atleast, to the extent, the
Government of India is principal share holder.
3. Considering the concurrent finding, in
opinion, the question of law as framed would not
arise. Consequently, appeal dismissed.
our
( R.S. MOHITE, J.)
( F.I.REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue